“Strategic transformations” World order and multipolarity.

italiatelegraph

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amjad Ismail Al , Agha

 

 

 

Until recently, the world order has faced unprecedented American delinquency, represented by the use or threat of force, in all international crises and conflicts. U.S. policy, with its broad implications and titles, has been to cut off all avenues for any negotiations, or internationalization of crises, except in terms of serving its strategy, and the most prominent feature of this has been the American uniqueness of decisions, even those relating to the interests of its traditional partners. In addition, U.S. policies have adopted the model of colonial control, the imposition of visions and resolutions, without realizing that the responsibility of international leadership requires a deep understanding of international problems and crises, and positive participation in resolving them by reducing crises, not creating them, which is a growing problem of its implications for all international affairs. On the other hand, the concept of U.S. leadership of a world that faces a knowledge problem among U.S. administrations is limited to the U.S. ability to secure national interests, a serious strategic dilemma in which the United States has fallen into the role of sole actor, and the main organizer of international relations.

In connection with the foregoing, political analyses, like consulting studies, have blended excessive optimism with pessimism about the international situation in general, but deepening the landscape of the new world order clearly shows us that the international system is in transition. It is a stage at which the United States, which is unique in international resolutions, is no longer unique. Today, there are major powers competing with the United States for the management of the international system, betting on the rise of China’s star on the one hand, European unity and Russia’s return to play its part on the international scene again, on the other.

On the other hand, there is a firm conviction among most strategic research centres that the world order, whose titles crystallized after the end of World War II, will not be able to preserve its old foundations, and that there are indications that it will be successful, until the Russian military operation in Ukraine clearly illustrates the signs of collapse that have been expected for decades.

In depth, in the decades following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world order was governed by a purely American role, which did not correspond to the strategic aspirations of Russia and China, the two countries that invested decades of U.S. involvement in minor conventional wars in Somalia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan, to protect their vital interests in the world, and the so-called democratization, which drained their capabilities, in parallel, moscow and Beijing have worked to take advantage of the world’s openness to them, building foundations for economic entities. Military is well established, while maintaining regimes that stand in contrast to the Western regime.

Although the world order appears to be still under America’s command, the components of multipolarity and the growing sorting between Western and other powers are evident, pressure on U.S. leadership of the world order has increased, and the number of countries challenging U.S. leadership has increased, especially since Washington’s multiple policies, and interlocking regional and international priorities, have weakened Both Washington and its allies. It is true that the United States still possesses sources of military and economic power, but it is also true that U.S. policies over the past decades have strengthened the positions of its regional and international adversaries.

Russia’s military operation in Ukraine has crystallized a new landscape of the world order, particularly since the essence of Russia’s strategy is based on parameters that seek to stop NATO’s expansion into Russia’s vital area. However, the European regimes are deeply problematic as a result of the continuing Russian-Ukrainian war, which threatens to break up the Western alliance, given its enormous military, political and financial cost.

The Administration of The President, Joe Biden, is seeking to maintain the momentum of the Western alliance against Russia. As a result, the United States is strengthening NATO by bringing together more countries. But in exchange for U.S. efforts, Russian and Chinese equations, including anti-U.S. policy forces, are resurfaming to build new alliances, which are a match for the American, and neutralize U.S. exclusivity with U.S. and international resolutions.

It has become clear that the rhetoric of unilateralism in U.S. leadership, such as america standing tall and seeing beyond the future without other countries, is no longer acceptable to Washington’s partners. It can therefore be said that, on the basis of the above, the United States, despite having the keys to power and seeking to hell with the great powers, has not been able to establish a unipolar system, and the practices of the past two decades have even been established to be unilaterally established by force outside the world order, which will produce a multipolar world order, the essence of which is agreement and consensus of States, to establish a new world order, not in an individual effort of these poles, but with an international agreement to share international responsibilities, it is impossible to continue to The international system is subject to one force, and it is more impossible to subject it by force.

italiatelegraph


Potrebbe piacerti anche
Commenti
Le opinioni espresse nei commenti sono degli autori e non del italiatelegraph.
Commenti
Loading...