Biden and the Middle East and the dilemma of Syria and Iran.

italiatelegraph

Written by .. Ruba Youssef Chahine

Between Democrats and Republicans in the United States, there is constant commitment and coordination regarding the continuation of the American policy that is based mainly on the principle of imposing a fait accompli, and this was clearly evident to many rulers around the world, so it was subordination to the rule of the strongest, and the lineups began in alliances and axes, and that since First World War.

In the Iraq war, and despite the complete destruction of the political and societal structure of Iraq, and in sympathy with the global terrorism that has ravaged Syria, as well as the war on Yemen, the larger American plan has not yet been completed, and the clock has begun to slow down, as a result of the changes imposed by the countries of Abt. To submit obligations of obedience to Washington, which is basically subordinate to the capitalist Zionist lobby, which controls the World Bank, and draws regional and international policies.

Who are the countries that imposed a changing reality for dealings in the foreign policy of the United States, and for which policies were formulated and strategies were formulated, in order to neutralize these countries from their anti-American course and work to sabotage them from the inside. Syria, Iran , Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon were countries that were a dam in the country. Directing the American agendas, and in compassion for that, these countries constitute a major obstacle to the activities of the Israeli entity in the region, as Iran is the main supporter of the resistance axis in these countries, and therefore the demolition arrangements for these countries came with the creation of the terrorism policy, and the creative chaos began to become clear in reality, by the words of “Condoleezza.” Rice, “which heralded a” new Middle East “according to the concept of the American administration.

Iran and the victory of the Iranian revolution

The internal transformations of Iranian policies, since the change of government in it and the fall of the Shah, which were accompanied by economic and military developments through which the general system of the Islamic Republic of Iran flourished, which forced Washington and European countries to build economic relations with Tehran, and Washington signed the joint action plan for the nuclear agreement, which generated hallways. The policies of the West in general, and Washington in particular, have exhausted them, which prompted the latter to break with Tehran, in order to prevent it from causing a revolution in the hierarchy of countries as a result of its economic and military progress, and the fear of its possession of a nuclear weapon, especially as America realizes the size of the power that Tehran will become in the region, Which constitutes a real threat to the security of the Zionist entity, as the whole of the relations that Iran has in the region, specifically in Iraq and Syria, and with Hizbullah in Lebanon, from which the support relations of the resistance factions in Palestine are branched out, where the Israeli entity is the hotbed, and between the detachments of the military development that will inevitably result from growth Economic, the American plan began to weaken the center of resistance through economic terrorism, and to create a series of disputes between countries in the region Illusion that Iran poses a threat to their national security, as Washington has done with the Gulf states.

In Syria, the central and pivotal state, which is one of the first countries that supported the Palestinian people in their rightful cause since the Palestinian catastrophe of 1948, and with the insistence of the Syrian state on its firm position on the right of the Palestinian people to regain every inch of Palestine, as well as Syria’s right in the Syrian Arab Golan, every Syria has paid a heavy price for these principled positions, as Syria’s policy of sovereignty and not being dependent on the orders of the West, distancing itself from most of the policies of dependence on the West, so it was the global terrorist war against it.

Likewise, Yemen, which is still fighting the enemies of humanity on behalf of humanity, and despite all the international and humanitarian charters and laws that guarantee the right and sovereignty of peoples, Washington, the West and some Arab and Islamic countries are still walking in the path of democracy claimant policies, which tasked them to implement the orders of the American administration to establish The so-called New Middle East, and tampering with the capabilities of sovereign states in Syria, Iraq, Iran and Yemen.

All of this is an American path that is compatible with the desires of the Israeli entity, and with the arrival of Joe Biden as director of the new American project in the Middle East, specifically in Syria and Iran, it seems that the course of developments that are engineered by America will not reach a result that is acceptable to the Zionist lobby complex, as Washington has plans and strategies, The countries of the resistance axis always have advanced plans and strategies, and perhaps the long-term policy that Tehran and Damascus have donated to employ in the course of American policies will undoubtedly result in a new reality and strategic equation that will haunt Washington as well as its miserable tools in the region.

italiatelegraph