Amjad Ismail Al-Agha
A statement whose realism is embodied with what we are witnessing today in terms of glorifying policies and justifying decisions. It is a saying that revolves around “whoever speaks a lot makes a lot of mistakes”, as this saying applies to many politicians who do not hide from giving speeches and holding press conferences and meetings, to consolidate their image in the minds, and market what they want in soft, effective and influential ways, and the reality of the situation confirms That the President of the Turkish regime, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is among the most prominent of those politicians, whose mistakes and contradictions in their statements are evident in many internal and external issues.
“Erdogan in the face of Erdogan,” it is not surprising that the man is the enemy of himself, or that he exposes his plans and what has been assigned to him many times and on multiple occasions, as Erdogan’s rhetorical ability did not cover the contents of what he thinks. An American, passionate, Israeli-oriented tool, as Erdogan said during a speech in Istanbul on March 4, 2006, speaking about the Greater Middle East project and the Turkish role in it, that “Turkey has an important and great role in the Greater Middle East. Do you know what it is? We have become an integral part. Those who launched the idea of the Greater Middle East and North Africa Project. In a television interview on February 14, 2004, he said: “I see Turkey now that it differs from what was previously mentioned in its foreign policies, especially Diyarbakir, in light of the American project called the current Greater Middle East, or the Broad Middle East, and I think that Diyarbakir could be A shining star or the center of this project. “
In the same context, Turkish journalist Ibrahim Qaban said, “Restoring the caliphate is the goal of Erdogan’s endeavor to support the Greater Middle East project.” He explained: “This project is summarized in the division of the Middle East into independent regions on an ethnic, religious and sectarian basis, which means the shortest and easiest way to restore the caliphate, and the return of the Ottoman dream again, led by Erdogan.”
Within the foregoing, it seems clear that Erdogan is engineering an American-Israeli project in the region, as Erdogan’s attempts have not been interrupted to achieve the maximum possible benefit from the political contradictions in the Middle East, and this comes according to an American, Israeli and Turkish equation, to popularize models of chaos in the region. The political maneuvers, as well as the military maneuvers that were made available during the so-called Arab Spring, achieved the solid ground needed by Israel to achieve its theory of securing its regional environment, and there is no way to achieve this except with Turkish assistance.
Erdogan, who has employed Arab causes for his benefit, especially the Palestinian cause. As the employment of these issues constituted an equation according to which it penetrated the hearts of Arabs and Muslims, but on the other hand, Erdogan raises with one hand the flags of Al-Aqsa and Jerusalem, and his second hand is in the hands of Israel with unparalleled intimacy, and at the same time the Turkish choir did not stop organizing slogans of solidarity and support for the Palestinian cause, but in the context of The foggy scene that frames the Middle East, the Turkish-Israeli relations remained far from delving into them, or revealing their contents and objectives in terms of regional realities and their strategic depth, specifically regarding the Palestinian issue, until the details of the Turkish-Israeli relationship contain many absent facts.
Erdogan has succeeded in appealing to the sympathy of Arabs and Muslims, as the political elegance and the arousal of passionate emotions may have achieved his goals among those absent from his strategic approach and style, despite what he shows in terms of the hostile statements towards Washington and Tel Aviv, these statements come in the context of a carefully prepared scenario that aims to keep it The pyramid of support for Arabs and Muslims, and to remain an American and Israeli spearhead that is constantly working to penetrate and fragment the region, and on a parallel side, it is clear that Erdogan is a strategic tool in the hands of Washington and Tel Aviv, directed according to the requirements of American and Israeli interests throughout the region. All of this comes according to a dramatic and theatrical situation with open content and goals.
In the same context, it is certain that many of those who were co-opted by Erdogan when he once rebuked Shimon Peres before leaving a public meeting in Davos in protest against Israel’s policy, and in another incident that was not lost on the minds of many, related to Israel’s apology to Turkey for the incident of the ship breaking the siege on Gaza.
Those two incidents and despite the creative scenario that was engineered by a joint Israeli-Turkish direction, the page of Turkish-Israeli relations cannot be bleached, nor can the false partial about Turkey’s defense of the Palestinian cause be trusted, and the evidence is that all Israeli terror incidents are directed against Palestine, the Palestinians, holy sites and Jerusalem, We did not move Erdogan’s mind towards Israel, except with denunciations and denunciations, while the options for friendship are multifaceted and at all levels, until this relationship has become unshakeable by a “whirlwind in a cup.”
In the end, the intensity of Turkish investment in the region, and sympathy for the Turkish mechanisms of interaction with regard to Arab issues, Turkey has turned, based on these data, into a major and effective party in the depth of the Israeli agenda throughout the region, so that the Middle East theater has a Turkish-Israeli strategic focus, according to the case Drama raises controversy, and its chapters will unfold in turn.
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
العربية