Written by :Ruba Youssef Chahine
In the past five decades, the Arab region has been struggling with Western Zionist policies, on the basis of the Palestinian right. Most of the Arab countries were in solidarity as governments with the Palestinian people in the right of return and liberation, and the October liberation war and the victories that followed it of the resistance in Lebanon were the most prominent effect in forming a point A shift in the political and military perspectives for the region, especially since the Israeli occupation managed, in the 1967 Naksa war, to occupy the Golan Heights, the Shebaa Farms, Wadi Araba and Sinai, which formed additional sites of conflict with the Israeli enemy in addition to occupied Palestine.
However, the victory of the resistance in Lebanon in 2000 and 2006 imposed other regional and international calculations for the alignments of some countries with the general scene of the region, but the most important thing is that the Western Zionist intelligence agency developed the addresses of political and intelligence dealing with the area surrounding the enemy’s entity, according to the developments taking place, which was prepared by the war heads In the United States, since the era of George Bush the son, regarding the resistance role represented by the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Lebanese Hezbollah, Syria and the Iraqi resistance.
The scheme of fragmentation and geographical division, based primarily on regionalism, sectarianism and sectarianism, began taking advantage of the reactionary thought of some groups inhabiting these target countries. Divisions over the policies of Western content and their Arab implementation.
In 2011 and the terrorist war on Syria, the results that Washington obtained from Iraq, and the resistance it interfered with, were shaped by the Popular Mobilization Forces, which the United States classifies as an arm of Iran in Iraq. An American problem that must be solved, as the assassination of the two leading martyrs, Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, was a painful blow to the axis of resistance, not to mention the terrorism that struck the Syrian state, which was difficult for the West to dissuade it from its firm stances towards the Palestinian issue. In terms of the growth of the axis of resistance, which was actually proven by the victory of July 2006, and which dropped the idea that the Israeli army is invincible and is the strongest in the region.
Syria and the meaning of the terrorist war against it
According to the American and Western agenda in general, Syria is the only country that rejects the peace process with “Israel”, and the only country that rejects monopolistic political decisions in all its political, military and economic forms. The war was the product of a steadfast position prior to the era of the late President Hafez al-Assad, and later to President Bashar Hafez Assad, then the terrorist bomb was thrown at Syria.
But Syria’s victory during these years represented a historic turning point for the Arab region, and despite the blurring of the scene by acknowledging this great victory, what Washington could not do in Syria by bringing about a political change that would lead to a military change towards “Israel” in order to preserve its national security, the Western political organs would activate it. Indeed, through its military might at times, and through its political decisions at other times, as happened with Trump’s confessions regarding the occupied Syrian Golan and Jerusalem as the capital of “Israel.”
Whoever looks at the international regional scene is fully aware of the extent of the political devastation that Western countries have spread on the arena in general, and here we are at the scene of overt normalization with the Israeli enemy, which for Israel is the most important item for its continuation and success in the region, so the internationalization of political issues to be under Western sponsorship From the Palestinian right to the Beirut explosion, which is witnessing an Arab retreat and a conflict of French and Turkish interests, for the greatest evidence that the Arab political community is divided, and that some presidents in relation to their peoples and what they made in their institutions do not reach the level of the state and its sovereignty.
It is a spectacle that the West wanted for Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, to banish the specter of resistance, and to activate the West’s laws based on complete control, while preserving the partial satisfaction of the party demanding Western intervention in peoples’ issues, because the rational logic of its occurrence confirms that it was made to serve “Israeli security”, especially The issue is no longer limited to the Zionist presence in the region, because the entity has already achieved that since the Camp David Accords, Oslo and Wadi Araba…!
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
العربية